Friday, July 30, 2004

J.Crawford Act III: I.Thomas vs. J.Paxson

J.Crawford's free agency flirt with NY has just about played out. Joe Sez the NY strategy was to put pressure on Chicago GM J.Paxson to re-sign and trade J.Crawford to NY. If not, then Crawford would be unhappy in Chicago and leave when his current contract expires next year.

Thomas tried to smooth talk Crawford to NY with promises of money and playing time. Joe Sez there was no real leverage NY could put on Chicago who own Crawford's rights this year. The threats about Crawford being unhappy and pushing the trade in the press were done put Paxson in a position where he would capitulate. Pressure Paxson into making a weak move. J.Paxson isn't that kind of GM (he wasn't that kind of player either). Thomas has to offer a deal Chicago wants. He cannot spin the situation to favor NY and his interests. As it stands, Crawford is going to be a Bull come Oct.

Joe Sez the the rush on Crawford's part is understandable but misguided. The Free agency market seemed crazy with D.Fisher, A.Foyle and B.Cardinal all getting fat paychecks and long term contracts. Why not cash in ?

<>Well, talent wise Crawford is a better player and he has far more potential for growth but character wise he's not in the same league as these three nor is he a leader on the basketball court. These less talent players earned their contracts with character, not talent. Crawford has to recognize that his next paycheck is determined by what he does and who is is, not how good he could be. Crawford needs to have a good season which means play smart, team oriented basketball. He may have to let his playing stats suffer desipte being a free agent and feeling the need a showcase his talent.

The draft rewards potential while free agency is rewarding character. We can thank Joe Dumars and his Pistons for that change - he won with character and role players. Oh, and maybe we should throw in a mention to the Portland Trail Blazers for setting the good bad example of a team loaded with talent and short on character.



.

No comments: